[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: What's the deal with kdedb?
From: Henrik Johnson <hpj () globecom ! net>
Date: 2001-05-16 12:24:33
[Download RAW message or body]
KDE 2.2 and KDE 2.1 is not binary compatible either. I've tried running
Kaccel at least broke it about a week ago I think. I found this out but
recompiling kdelibs and not kdebase after an update from CVS and it
didn't work.
/Henrik Johnson
GlobeCom AB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 5/16/01, 2:47:39 PM, aleXXX <alexander.neundorf@rz.tu-ilmenau.de> wrote
regarding Re: What's the deal with kdedb?:
> On Wednesday 16 May 2001 13:45, Matthias Elter wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:16:27AM -0400, Alessandro Praduroux wrote:
> > > and wait for QT3/KDE3.
> >
> > Just for the record, the plan is to port KDE 2.x to Qt3. There wont be a
> > KDE 3.0 for at least another year. Maintaining the 2.x platform is
critical
> > for KDE now. So we might have a stable KDE 2.X based on Qt3 in fall 2001.
> >
> > Matthias
> Sure ?
> This helps nothing. Since Qt 3 will be binary incompatible to Qt 2, all
our
> KDE libs will be binary incompatible.
> Then there is no point in keeping it "KDE 2".
> Bye
> Alex
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic