On Thursday 19 April 2001 01:43, Dawit Alemayehu wrote: > Hi, > > I guess I will be the lone dissenter then on this issue. My primary > problem with this is that all that is being changed is that some of the > non-essential, but perhaps useful packages are all being lumped together > into one large package. This is probably very convenient from our > (developer/maintainers) point of view. Specially for the person > responsible for this package. However, I cannot see how this is going to > benefit the user who just wants to say get one of the konqueror plugins ? Very good point. > (S)He will be forced to download the whole package just to get a single > io-slave or plugin or whatever. This has been one of the biggest > complaints by users about upgrading KDE and the reason I was asking for Yes, I also hear this very often. The users don't gain very much from our component technology if they can't update single components. > putting all the io-slaves into one package on its own and asking user to > download it separately. For example, kdelibs can come only with the file > io-slave and all the others will be packaged into two other kioslave > packages, kioslave-basic and kioslave-extra or some similar name. Then we > can put ftp, http, pop, man, help and any other io-slaves to be used by > most people into the basic package and remaining ones will go into the > kioslave-extra package. > > I know the above setup will mean new dependencies for packagers and > probably a PAT to originally adapt, but it will be mostly beneficial to the > end user as (s)he will only need to update the necessary package for bug > fixes in io-slaves or plugins or new icons or wallpapers etc etc. Anyways, > what I am getting at is that packaging addons or non-essential plugins etc > into one large package IMHO is the wrong approach. I second this. Extra modules like: extra-ioslaves, extra-konq-plugins, extra-kate-plugins, extra-theme-stuff (wallpapers, icons, sound) and so on would be better. Maybe we should also think about a complete restructure of our packages, at least for KDE 3. This was discussed already very often. It is currently very hard to update single applications, e.g. konqy, kmail, konsole, whatever. I don't know how hard it would be to create release packages of single apps. Bye Alex