On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, David Faure wrote:
> 
> > Ok, so 2.1 is almost done, now is the time to wonder about what we do after 2.1 :-)
> >
> > It seems to be already agreed that there will be a 2.1.1, with more documentation,
> > translations and critical bugfixes.
> >
> > But the question is:
> > Do most developers have new apps or features to commit, that would involve
> > much new documentation and translations, OR do most developers would rather
> > keep bugfixing what's in 2.1 and get it released in 2.1.1 ?
> 
> The other question is, what will be the next release after 2.1.1? Will we
> have a 2.2 (much the same thing as 2.1 is to 2.0 - fixes and extra
> features, same API, ...), or go for 3.0 right away (on a side note, any
> ideas when Qt 3.0 will be released, since we'll probably want to use
> that for KDE 3.0?)?
> 
> I'd rather avoid having 3 branches (2_1_1, 2_2, 3_0) open at the same time
> (syncing fixes between all of them would be painful).

I'd say we should go for 2.2 first.

Let's wait for Qt 3.0 before _starting_ KDE 3.0