[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: PATCH: gcc 3 hacks
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () kde ! org>
Date:       2001-02-18 18:33:46
[Download RAW message or body]

Martijn Klingens wrote:
> 
> On Sunday 18 February 2001 19:15, Peter Putzer wrote:
> > Huh? Exception handling has got nothing to do with debugging (you seem to
> > confuse the two).
> >
> Hmm... you're right. But then I wonder how exceptions are implemented in
> Qt/KDE and gcc/libc that they cause problems.
> 
> I assume I'm missing a point here, but what? If _WE_ don't use exceptions,
> why do we need to disable them? However, if we use them, why do we use them
> if they can be disabled as well? I thought we only used them in debug mode,
> just like e.g. kdDebug and friends. If that's not the case, then I don't
> understand.
> Or does GCC always create lots of extra code to catch exceptions that never
> occur?
Something like this. Each and every new() throws an exception 

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
People in cars cause accidents. Accidents in cars cause people.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]