[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: PATCH: gcc 3 hacks
From:       Waldo Bastian <bastian () kde ! org>
Date:       2001-02-18 6:12:24
[Download RAW message or body]

I rather abort compilation on libstdstc++-v3 than compile with exceptions. We 
hardly use anything from libstdc++ and I really don't see why KDE should 
suffer if they aren't able to fix their headers. 

Cheers,
Waldo

On Saturday 17 February 2001 06:34, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been following gcc/libstdc++-v3 development for a while now and I came
> to the conclusion that they won't be able to sort out the issues before
> release. It took them 4 weeks to include a trivial fix in the headers I
> posted a bugreport, a testcase and a patch for and I'm pretty sure it'll
> take them a few magnitudes longer to fix their lib to work with
> -fno-exceptions, especially as they seem to like to commit half part of the
> patch to HEAD branch (which is post 3.0) and the other half to the
> gcc-3_0-branch and you have to try to sort out which files to get from the
> several incompatible branches in order to get something that doesn't
> segfault during bootstrapping already.
-- 
bastian@kde.org | SuSE Labs KDE Developer | bastian@suse.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]