On Monday 05 February 2001 16:19, Waldo Bastian wrote:

> > Yes, we are in a codefreeze, but if the stuff was important we had
> > already other cases where we broke such rules. The patches are rather
> > small and nicely reviewable and we can probably make sure without too
> > much effort that they won't break anything as long as multihead support
> > is not enabled. So why not put them in in this case? Waiting for 2.2 will
> > be a long time, and there were quite some people asking for multihead
> > support.
>
> I think there is a bugreport that complains that this didn't work in 2.0.
> So this is clearly a bugfix and not a feature.
>
> New features will have to wait for 2.2.

  Oh my, now that you mention it, I think there _is_ at least one bug report 
against this............

   I guess we'd better fix it.

-- 

George Staikos