On Monday 05 February 2001 12:50, Lars Knoll wrote:
> Yes, we are in a codefreeze, but if the stuff was important we had already
> other cases where we broke such rules. The patches are rather small and
> nicely reviewable and we can probably make sure without too much effort
> that they won't break anything as long as multihead support is not enabled.
> So why not put them in in this case? Waiting for 2.2 will be a long time,
> and there were quite some people asking for multihead support.

I think there is a bugreport that complains that this didn't work in 2.0. So 
this is clearly a bugfix and not a feature.

New features will have to wait for 2.2.

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
bastian@kde.org | SuSE Labs KDE Developer | bastian@suse.com