[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Proposal: replace KDOC with Doxygen after 2.0 (fwd)
From:       Antonio Larrosa =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jim=E9nez?= <antlarr () arrakis ! es>
Date:       2000-10-23 0:34:26
[Download RAW message or body]

Richard Moore escribi=F3:
> =

> Antonio Larrosa Jim=E9nez wrote:
> >
> > Does that mean that Doxygen doesn't allow having the docs in the
> > header files ?
> =

> No, it supports docs in the header files. The only issue is if you
> can actively stop it allowing people to put their docs in the cpp
> files instead. According to Peter's other mail, the answer is yes.
> =


Ah, ok.

> =

> Good idea, I'd like to see that too. I guess the main difference
> will be the addition of class diagrams like this:
> =

> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/qdbttabular/doc/html/class_qdbttabular.gif=

> =


Looks nice ...

> I guess we should aim to convert these class diagrams to pngs before
> we make a release dependent on doxygen.
> =

> This is taken from:
> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/qdbttabular/doc/html/class_qdbttabular-inc=
lude.html
> but the output of current versions of doygen look much nicer than
> this example would suggest.

=2E.. but this doesn't. Better see a more current output.

Greetings,

--
Antonio Larrosa Jimenez
KDE core developer
antlarr@arrakis.es        larrosa@kde.org
http://www.arrakis.es/~rlarrosa
KDE - The development framework of the future, today.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]