[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: HEAD openend
From:       Richard Moore <rich () ipso-facto ! freeserve ! co ! uk>
Date:       2000-10-19 22:44:56
[Download RAW message or body]



Stephan Kulow wrote:
> 
> Richard Moore wrote:
> >
> > Torsten Rahn wrote:
> > >
> > > Navindra Umanee wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dirk Mueller <mueller@kde.org> wrote:
> > > > > > As we aim for iterative and more frequent releases from now on, KDE 2.1 is
> > > > > > scheduled for March 2001 and will contain kdelibs&kdebase only.
> > > > >
> > > > > ah, so its not 6 months, its 5 months. much better :->
> > > > >
> > > > > What about a release around christmas?
> > > >
> > > > I *strongly* agree!  2.1 doesn't have to be perfect, only better.
> > > > Let's not let get too carried away just yet.
> > >
> > > A 2.1 around christmas is completely unrealistic.
> > > This would mean that we would have to start beta-testing in
> > > four weeks already.
> >
> > It would be a lot easier this time because the release would
> > only include kdelibs and kdebase. If we can keep the changes
> > in these packages down to a minimum then we should be ok. We
> > can use a shorter release cycle for a relatively small update
> > like this.
> >
> This is nonsense, sorry. But kdelibs and kdebase were the one
> we released mainly this time. We didn't delay 2.0 because of
> changes in any other module

No, maybe not, but many fixes to other modules were delayed
because of the freeze. For instance I have code to write
for Keystone, Torben had changes to KSpread...

Rich.

> 
> Greetings, Stephan
> 
> --
> ... but you ain't had mine

-- 
     Richard Moore		rich@ipso-facto.freeserve.co.uk
http://www.macromedia.com/	rjmoore@macromedia.com
http://developer.kde.org/	rich@kde.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]