[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: HEAD openend
From:       David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2000-10-19 17:14:57
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 19 October 2000 19:09, Torsten Rahn wrote :
>David Faure wrote:
>> 
>> On Thursday 19 October 2000 16:33, Navindra Umanee wrote :
>> >Torsten Rahn <torsten@kde.org> wrote:
>> >> > I *strongly* agree!  2.1 doesn't have to be perfect, only better.
>> >> > Let's not let get too carried away just yet.
>> >>
>> >> A 2.1 around christmas is completely unrealistic.
>> >> This would mean that we would have to start beta-testing in
>> >> four weeks already.
>> >>
>> >> Better do a 2.0.2 release around that time or a release
>> >> of filter-updates arts/kmail/knode or kwhatever -updates
>> >> in a bunch around that time.
>> Torsten: read the other mails. There's not much point in a 2.0.2,
>> if the translators/documenters/you are happy with 2.0.1, and the code
>> in 2.0.1 is the same as the one in 2.0.
>
>So you think that all docs/textstrings will be translated and everything
>documented in 4-6 weeks? Dream on.

Well, if that's not the case, then why not wait until we have all the 
translations and docs that we can reasonably expect ?

I don't see the point here. If we have to make two 2.0.x releases for some
reason (please someone me which), then at least this request should come
from the people concerned, i.e. translators and doc writers, don't you think ?

-- 
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~david/, http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today
See http://www.kde.org/kde1-and-kde2.html for how to set up KDE 2

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]