[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Linking kdelibs with libqt-mt again
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () kde ! org>
Date:       2000-09-15 22:13:05
[Download RAW message or body]

Rik Hemsley wrote:
> 
> #if Stephan Kulow
> > Carsten Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 11:35:55PM +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > And I still say that it's not the right time to think about it.
> > > > We can switch it on right after 2.0 and be it that we release KDE 2.1
> > > > as linking to another Qt for some plattforms. But don't rush that in.
> > >
> > > aren't we aiming at binary compatibility after 2.0?
> >
> > Aren't we aiming for a 2.0 that works? We are in a feature freeze and
> > you
> > want to add something drastic as this? NO!
> 
> Do you know what this does ? I'm sure I told you. It adds a mutex to
> QApplication. That's all. I've been running all of KDE linked to libqt-mt
> using my patch for a while now and experienced no related problems.
Why is libqt-mt an extra library then? Why do you need kdelibs to link
against
libqt-mt? Why can't you tell your users to rename libqt-mt to libqt?
Should
have the same effect.

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
... but you ain't had mine

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]