[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: about private 'd' pointer
From: Falk Brettschneider <gigafalk () yahoo ! com>
Date: 2000-08-31 8:35:16
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi,
Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
>
> Well, the point about that d is exactly to be private! If you make it protected
> and let inheritting classes access is, then adding/removing variables to/from the
> structure breaks binary compatibility. (obviously)
> (which makes the idea of the "d" void :)
>
> So I think what you want are simple protected member variables. Just keep in mind
> that these are fixed then, meaning adding/removing/changing them breaks binary compatibility.
> But that's the price for the advantage of them being shared / available for inheritting classes.
Hmm...right. :)
What about methods? Is the private d pointer intended to have methods
that should be hidden to the outside world?
>
> Bye,
> Simon
Thanks a lot,
F@lk
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic