David Faure wrote:
> 
> At 22:39 29/08/00 +0200, you wrote:
> >David Faure wrote:
> >>
> >> At 13:24 29/08/00 +0200, Stephan "Master" Kulow wrote:
> >> >I would like to propose to make this only if not compiled with
> >> >--enable-debug.
> >> >If you did, the backtraces are often very useful. If someone got binary
> >> >packages, his bug reports are useless unless he described what's wrong.
> >> >drkonqi shouldn't be more than a 'it died' message box.
> >>
> >> I agree 100%.
> >>
> >OK, how can drkonqi know kmail is compiled with debug?
> Hmm, good point. Needs to be a parameter that is sent to drkonqi, from
> the crashing app - in which the sig handler has to know it from the
> app itself (hmmm...)
> 
> >Let this depend
> >on if drkonqi is compiled with --enable-final? Would be a good heurstic
> >to start :)
> I don't see the relation.... Or do you mean all packagers use
> --enable-final now ?
> 
Oops, s/final/debug

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
... but you ain't had mine