From kde-core-devel  Tue Jun 27 22:37:52 2000
From: David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:37:52 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: xxx_la and libxxx_la usage in Makefile.am (koffice here)
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=96214567606589

On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 12:35:13AM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Its not possible to use prog_la _and_ libprog_la in one Makefile.am,
> because some platforms need a lib-prefix on every DSO, which means that
> both _la's will be called libprog, which obviously fails. In this case it
> was introduced two days ago in koffice for using KLMs. As I don't know if
> the libxx_la's are really needed (I guess for dynamically loading them
> into the koffice framework, they are), I'm not sure of the right way to
> fix it. Either way one of the xxx needs to be renamed, preferably the
> libxxx, as that is a more internal (to koffice) name, or libxxx_la needs
> to go away.

According to kdelibs/NAMING (thanks Waldo for that), the libxxx.la files
should be renamed to libxxxpart.la. Unless we want a different naming in KOffice,
but I don't see why we would.

-- 
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://home.clara.net/faure/, http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today
See http://www.kde.org/kde1-and-kde2.html for how to set up KDE 2