pbrown@redhat.com wrote:
> does anyone else agree that this is inconsistent?
> 
>   /**
>    * @return The complete URL.
>    *
>    * @param _trailing This may be ( -1, 0 +1 ). -1 strips a trailing '/'
> from the path, +1 adds
>    *                  a trailing '/' if there is none yet and 0 returns
> the
>    *                  path unchanged.
>    */
>   QString url( int _trailing = 0 ) const;
>  
>   /**
>    * @return A human readable URL.
>    */
>   QString prettyURL() const; 
> 
> (i.e. url vs URL).

No, I don't think so... well, it would maybe be a tiny bit better as
'prettyUrl' to be more consistent... but as it is wrt our method
naming, it fits.

> What is the difference between the two anyway?
 
The first
>    * @return The complete URL.

and the second
>    * @return A human readable URL.
-- 
Kurt Granroth            | http://www.granroth.org
KDE Developer/Evangelist | SuSE Labs Open Source Developer
granroth@kde.org         | granroth@suse.com
           KDE -- Putting a Friendly Face on Unix