[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: -lXm missing
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () kde ! org>
Date:       2000-05-30 10:17:20
[Download RAW message or body]

"Jesper K. Pedersen" wrote:
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Just want to let you know that KDE still suffers from requiring -lXm when
> compiling, though this library is *not* part of kdesupport.
> 
Well, we won't include freetype there. the viewer should be skipped if
no
Motif is present. Maybe you have the config.cache from an old
installation?

Greetings, Stephan

> 
> g++ -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fno-check-new -Wall -pedantic -W -Wpointer-arith \
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -Wno-long-long -fno-builtin -o nspluginviewer \
> nsplugin.o viewer.o kxt.o kxt.moc.o NSPluginCallbackIface_stub.o \
> NSPluginClassIface_skel.o -Wl,--export-dynamic  -L/usr/X11R6/lib \
> -L/local2/blackie/kde-source/qt-copy/lib -L/opt/kde2/lib -lXm \
> -L/opt/gcc-2.95.2/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2 -L/opt/gcc-2.95.2/lib -lSM \
> -lICE -lSM -lICE -lICE -lSM -lICE /opt/kde2/lib/libkio.so /opt/kde2/lib/libkdeui.so \
> /opt/kde2/lib/libkdecore.so -ldl /opt/kde2/lib/libkde-qt-addon.so -lSM -lICE \
> /opt/kde2/lib/libDCOP.so -lSM -lICE -lICE -lqt -ljpeg -lXext -lX11 -lSM -lICE -lz \
> -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc -lXt -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/opt/kde2/lib -Wl,--rpath \
> -Wl,/opt/kde2/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/local2/blackie/kde-source/qt-copy/lib \
> -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib /opt/binutils-2.9.1/bin/ld: cannot open -lXm: No \
> such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** \
> [nspluginviewer] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory \
> `/local2/blackie/kde-build/kdebase/nsplugins/viewer' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] \
> Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/local2/blackie/kde-build/kdebase/nsplugins'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/local2/blackie/kde-build/kdebase'
> make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2


-- 
As long as Linux remains a religion of freeware fanatics,
Microsoft have nothing to worry about.  
                       By Michael Surkan, PC Week Online


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]