[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Moving kfind to kdeutils
From:       Michael Koch <m_koch () bigfoot ! de>
Date:       2000-03-31 12:20:38
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Fri, 31 Mar 2000 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
> Matthias Hoelzer-Kluepfel wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > any objections? kfind makes not too much sense in kdebase,
> > IMHO. I would like to move it.
> > 
> Well, moving kwrite to kdelibs and amor into kdebase then ;)
> kfind was always a good extension to kfile and konqueror, but
> I'm not too sure if kfile still calls it - and konqueror could
> look for it in case :)

It would be great to move libkwrite (not the whole kwrite) to kdelibs for
compile issues. Many apps will need it. It is a fault for an app to depend on
kdeutils to compile. Kdevelop, KSql, KBackpage will definitly use it and I
think there are some others too. For distribution then we can split it e.g. into
kdelibs and kdelibs-utils, but remaining it in kdeutils is wrong.


Ciao,
Michael
--
koch@kde.org, m_koch@bigfoot.de
http://heaven.riednet.wh.tu-darmstadt.de/~mkoch

To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                 -- reddy@lion.austin.ibm.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]