On Sam, 04 Mär 2000, Harri Porten wrote:
> Hi !
>
> The introduction of qk has very well served its purpose of buffering
> changes between Qt CVS and our code. Now, that we are approaching a KDE
> 2.0 API freeze I would like to inquire the status of these files,
> though.
>
> Do I assume correctly that our copy of qiconview.* will vanish with Qt
> 2.1 (Reggie, thanks a lot for keeping it in sync btw) ?

Yes.

> What about
> QAction, QDom, QXML, QCanvas and QPolygonScanner ? When will they become
> official part of libqt ?

Not in 2.1

> I'm mainly asking since I think we can't ship kdelibs this way. We
> advertize kdelibs to be LPGL'ed (or more liberal) to even attract
> commercial use. Sure, the relevant authors from TT sort of give their
> silent agreement to the current state. But would they consider to
> dual-license the (current!) code in question to clear this issue ?

I forwarded the mail to the internal TT mailinglist. I'll let you know the 
results of the discussion.

-- 
Reggie (reggie@troll.no)