Mario Weilguni wrote:
> 
> I've done some basic testing with this ESL approach (if you don't have read
> about it yet, there is a document at http://homepage.sime.com/esl.html ).
> 
[...]
> 
> So you can expect from a basic KDE 1.1.2 desktop a memory saving around 5 - 7
> Megabytes, depending on amount of programs used and compiler settings. For a
> 128 MB System this is not too much, but for low-end system (32-64MB) this is
> quite alot.
> 

If I'm not wrong, the bigger the libraries are, the more memory ESL saves,
isn't it ?
If only looking at Qt we have:
2261447 sep 14 10:16 /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt.so.1.44
and
5494001 dic 18 16:28 /usr/lib/qt2/lib/libqt.so.2.1.0
# strip libqt.so.2.1.0
4940632 dic 21 12:15 libqt.so.2.1.0

That would mean that we would save (a bit) more than 7 Mb in the HEAD branch,
IMHO that's definitely sufficient to use ESL if Waldo's work on the dynamic
linker cannot be done.

Greetings,

--
Antonio Larrosa Jimenez
Student of Mathematics
antlarr@arrakis.es        larrosa@kde.org
http://www.arrakis.es/~rlarrosa
KDE - The development framework of the future, today.