[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: questionYesNo (again)
From:       Waldo Bastian <bastian () suse ! de>
Date:       1999-12-08 11:46:00
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 08 Dec 1999, Antonio Larrosa wrote:

>  3) Change its name to questionYesNoStrList or something like that
>    Con: The name is ugly
> 
>  4) Call the ANSI C++ committee to give priority to exact type matching
>    methods over methods that could be called by using special constructors
>    in the parameters :/
> 
> What would be the best solution ? 

4) >:-)

> I'm really thinking about the third one, as it could be made before KRASH
> and the "Con" is not that bad :-)
> (only konqueror and the KMessageBox test are ussing this method for now)

Can't you call it "questionYesNoList"? 
 
> Waldo: While I'm at it, can I remove the old method and implement it just
> as a call to this one with an empty list as you proposed ? (The look is
> exactly the same in this case)

Sure.

Cheers,
Waldo

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]