[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    RE: some thoughts on libkio
From:       Matthias Ettrich <ettrich () troll ! no>
Date:       1999-12-07 12:18:00
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 07 Dec 1999, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Dec 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > 
> > > You missed the part that said that processes linked against
> > > Qt/kdecore/kdeui need 480Kb of non-shared memory.
> > 
> > Aside from KSocket which could perhaps be moved into another library, how
> > much less memory would a non QApp/KApp program use if it was linked merely
> > against libqt?
> 
> libqt causes the most overhead. Please have a look at this meminfo
> script I attached to one of my other mails and play around with it a
> little. Maybe the BSD linker is smarter... 

Is that with a libqt that still contains the non-const unicode tables?

Matthias

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]