[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Toolkits and IDL
From: Roberto Alsina <ralsina () unl ! edu ! ar>
Date: 1999-10-12 13:09:26
[Download RAW message or body]
Hello,
One of the points I've seen explained in this whole Canossa/KOM/OP/CuteIDL
thing (I still don't get it all ;-) is that if you wanted to provide the
possibility to write a component that didn't use Qt, it was before kinda
possible (if you reimplemented OP using Gtk) and that it is now still
possible (if you reimplement Canossa?).
Now, I can see why reimplementing the Qt app through IDL (OP) was a pain.
But, I think there is a small solution:
Implementing a small generic GUI toolkit through a IDL interface.
For example, suppose someone (I am 80% done ;-) implemented GraphApp over
Qt http://www.cs.su.oz.au/~loki/graphapp/
Its a very small toolkit. It evolves slowly. It should not be terribly
hard to expose over IDL.
So, would it make sense to do so? Comments?
PS: I am going to finish implementing GraphApp/Qt (and GraphApp/KDE)
anyway just to provide a reasonable C binding for KDE, so this argument is
orthogonal to that.
("\''/").__..-''"`-. . Roberto Alsina
`9_ 9 ) `-. ( ).`-._.`) ralsina@unl.edu.ar
(_Y_.)' ._ ) `._`. " -.-' Centro de Telematica
_..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.' Universidad Nacional del Litoral
(l)-'' ((i).' ((!.' Santa Fe - Argentina
KDE Developer (MFCH)
Not mad, but bound more than a madman is (Romeo and Juliet, Act I Scene II)
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic