On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 11:13:48AM +0200, Dirk A. Mueller wrote: > David Faure wrote: > > > That wouldn't help us in any way : using an ORB instead of another > > still means using STL or implementation-specific collections, instead > > of the ones we have already in memory : QTL. > > But ;) Orbit has a memory footprint of about 1.3 MB. > > Mico uses 5.7MB here. > > Low-memory systems would be happy about that.. Who would be happy with a broken CORBA implementation which is much less robust than MICO, and contains one third of its features ? -- David FAURE david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org http://www.insa-lyon.fr/People/AEDI/dfaure/index.html KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today