[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    icons
From:       Torsten Rahn <rahn () astrophysik ! uni-kiel ! de>
Date:       1999-09-15 16:31:40
[Download RAW message or body]

> Hi!
> 
> The convertion to lo-appname.png icons is now almost
> finished. I also copied the large- icons to the HEAD

great!

> branch. What is missing now are the hi color icons.
> The problem is that I can't say (without looking at
> each other) which one is hicolor and which is not.

consider those which are in KDE 1.1.2 in the default-
tree to be hicolor-icons (some aren't but that doesn't 
matter right now. We'll change that ASAP).
consider those which are new to be hicolor-icons as 
well until someone confirmed that they are locolors.

> So I would like to delay that move, but if someone
> has a list, feel free to mail it to me :)

Nope, no list.

> My $KDEDIR/share/icons directory looks now like:
> large/
> locolor/
> mini/
> 
> While the locolor directory has amazing 235 entries.

If you took the locolor-icons from KDE 1.1.1 then
all are locolor-icons. The same applies to the 
locolor-tarball that I sent your for KDE 1.1.2

If you're unsure please send me a tarball and 
I'll have a look as soon as possible. I'm right now
quite busy so I can't promise to do it at once
nor do I have time to checkout pre-alpha-KDE 2.0 :-(
(Especially as I'd like to join KDETwo and I'll
have to finish things quicker because of this 
than I thought.)

> Looking at it, it seems to me, that not all are locolor
> icons - so someone should make sure that icons named
> lo- really comply to the colour palette - caitoo's for 
> example doesn't ;(

Yepp, it is completely out of style (It's obviously a 
Windowmaker/Afterstep-icon and needs to be redone 
to integrate smoothly into our iconset.)
 
> Greetings, Stephan
> 
Greetings,
Torsten

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]