On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Harri Porten wrote:
> Mosfet wrote:
> > 
> > We are talking about 10 items so far... If we get a ton of methods I can see
> > splitting things up based on functionality, but not based on if something is
> > loaded from KConfig or not. As to if we should take UI specific methods,
> > encapsulate them in a class, and have it accessed through KGlobal, that's up to
> > you all I guess. It does seem funny to me to do that for just 4 methods tho.
> 
> I agree with Sirtaj and Stephan here: let's keep this class as "clean"
> as possible. Conglomeration of all sorts of functionality will make it
> more difficult to maintain. Please split it up into several classes.
> We'll benifit from that in the long run.

Second.

--Stefan