Stephan Kulow wrote:
> 
> Richard Moore wrote:
> >
> > Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > >
> > > pbrown@redhat.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Why is there so much duplication between the kfile and konq libraries?
> > > > Doesn't it seem like we should collapse the two into one?  One example is
> > > > the KFileInfo that is in the kfile library.  While it's API is different,
> > > > it is very similar to the KFileItem that is in libkonq.
> > > >
> > > > It seems that much of what is available only in kdebase/libkonq should
> > > > maybe move into kdelibs?
> > > >
> > > KFileInfo is really an internal class of the file dialog. It's just a
> > > container
> > > that is passed from the engine (KDir) to the view (KFileInfoContents). I
> > > see
> > > no real reason to change this.
> >
> > The KFileInfo API is almost exactly the same as QFileInfo. It makes it
> > easy to port Qt code that only worked on local files to KDE by making it
> > easy to extend the code to cover URLs.
> >
> But from what I remember, KFileInfo didn't work well without KDir and
> doesn't
> cover all features QFileInfo has.

True, but that's because at the time the focus was on the file dialog.
I'm planning to work on this a bit when I write the kpsion backup
program.

Rich.


> 
> Greetings, Stephan
> 
> --
> Better give your hours some more life than
> your life some more hours. - anonymous

-- 
     Richard Moore		rich@ipso-facto.freeserve.co.uk
http://www.robocast.com/	richard@robocast.com
http://developer.kde.org/	rich@kde.org