Richard Moore wrote:
> 
> Stephan Kulow wrote:
> >
> > pbrown@redhat.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Why is there so much duplication between the kfile and konq libraries?
> > > Doesn't it seem like we should collapse the two into one?  One example is
> > > the KFileInfo that is in the kfile library.  While it's API is different,
> > > it is very similar to the KFileItem that is in libkonq.
> > >
> > > It seems that much of what is available only in kdebase/libkonq should
> > > maybe move into kdelibs?
> > >
> > KFileInfo is really an internal class of the file dialog. It's just a
> > container
> > that is passed from the engine (KDir) to the view (KFileInfoContents). I
> > see
> > no real reason to change this.
> 
> The KFileInfo API is almost exactly the same as QFileInfo. It makes it
> easy to port Qt code that only worked on local files to KDE by making it
> easy to extend the code to cover URLs.
> 
But from what I remember, KFileInfo didn't work well without KDir and
doesn't
cover all features QFileInfo has.

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
Better give your hours some more life than
your life some more hours. - anonymous