[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Kandalf: request for review
From:       Ömer Fadıl USTA <omerusta () gmail ! com>
Date:       2023-12-12 5:23:07
Message-ID: CAATbBR1dKJTsdWH4Y2FZShu+=1YSdAh-oMbPeTKJSogfwJFVog () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

isnt cognos ( not k but c ) IBM's software ?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 07:40 Loren Burkholder <computersemiexpert@outlook.com>
wrote:

> On Thursday, December 7, 2023 10:28:48 AM EST Loren Burkholder wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I've been working towards getting Kandalf ready for integration into KDE
> (and I'd like to thank everyone who has pitched in to help me, mainly
> Laurent and redstrate). At this point, while the app is not necessarily
> feature-complete or fully polished, it's getting close to that point.
> Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for inclusion
> in the KDE apps.
> >
> > You can reach me on Matrix at @lorendb:nheko.im for more instant
> communications.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Loren Burkholder
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've settled on "Kognos" as a good name for this app. (I'm not creative
> enough to come up with the name myself; fittingly, this name was generated
> by ChatGPT.) Only after I had already changed the sources to say "Kognos"
> instead of "Kandalf" did I think to look the name up online; it seems that
> there was a company called Kognos, but they were bought out and the name
> was retired a year or two ago, so I don't think that we're in danger of a
> naming collision. Furthermore, the US Patent and Trademark Office doesn't
> have Kognos listed as a registered trademark. With that being said, I'm all
> for staying within the law, so if you have legitimate reason to think that
> Kognos is not acceptable, let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Loren

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="auto"><div>isnt cognos ( not k but c ) IBM&#39;s software ?<br><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 07:40 \
Loren Burkholder &lt;<a \
href="mailto:computersemiexpert@outlook.com">computersemiexpert@outlook.com</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Thursday, December 7, 2023 \
10:28:48 AM EST Loren Burkholder wrote:<br> &gt; Hi all!<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; I&#39;ve been working towards getting Kandalf ready for integration into KDE \
(and I&#39;d like to thank everyone who has pitched in to help me, mainly Laurent and \
redstrate). At this point, while the app is not necessarily feature-complete or fully \
polished, it&#39;s getting close to that point. Therefore, I&#39;d like to officially \
request a review of Kandalf for inclusion in the KDE apps.<br> &gt; <br>
&gt; You can reach me on Matrix at @lorendb:<a href="http://nheko.im" rel="noreferrer \
noreferrer" target="_blank">nheko.im</a> for more instant communications.<br> &gt; \
<br> &gt; Thanks,<br>
&gt; Loren Burkholder<br>
<br>
Hi all,<br>
<br>
I&#39;ve settled on &quot;Kognos&quot; as a good name for this app. (I&#39;m not \
creative enough to come up with the name myself; fittingly, this name was generated \
by ChatGPT.) Only after I had already changed the sources to say &quot;Kognos&quot; \
instead of &quot;Kandalf&quot; did I think to look the name up online; it seems that \
there was a company called Kognos, but they were bought out and the name was retired \
a year or two ago, so I don&#39;t think that we&#39;re in danger of a naming \
collision. Furthermore, the US Patent and Trademark Office doesn&#39;t have Kognos \
listed as a registered trademark. With that being said, I&#39;m all for staying \
within the law, so if you have legitimate reason to think that Kognos is not \
acceptable, let me know.<br> <br>
Thanks,<br>
Loren</blockquote></div></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]