[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Possible to move some KF5 frameworks to invent?
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2019-08-12 22:17:44
Message-ID: 6720378.bCviZtdtRJ () xps
[Download RAW message or body]

El dilluns, 12 d'agost de 2019, a les 11:38:50 CEST, Ben Cooksley va \
escriure:
> Those familiar to Git will be aware that it is very much possible to
> limit the scope of hooks like our Notification hooks, while still
> allowing them to be caught when entering branches that are subject to
> Notification. At this time the only proposals i've seen for this have
> been for "everything but master and stable branches" which
> unfortunately is not a scalable solution we can support due to the
> significant variance in schemes used for naming stable branches across
> different projects (not without pushing the maintenance role for
> handling all these different naming schemes on to Sysadmin)

You have not read my email then ;)

I suggested to do it the other way around and allow force push on branches \
named review_*

This solves the problem of "naming of important branches is not consistent" \
by making consistent the "naming of the non important branches"

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> > 
> > Regards.
> > --
> > Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
> > 
> > enioka Haute Couture - proud patron of KDE, https://hc.enioka.com/en
> 
> Regards,
> Ben
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]