[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Policy regarding QtWebKit and QtScript
From:       Pau Garcia i Quiles <pgquiles () elpauer ! org>
Date:       2015-12-22 23:28:51
Message-ID: CAKcBoks1+rBwp+m9Gd2tW9Go=f0G+Xkq8NSSp3_HBfaj-t1LSA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano@tiscali.it>
wrote:


>
> Shouldn't it be the other way around? Workable solution first and drop the
> old
> one later?
>
>
That's exactly what people said when plans to drop QtWebKit and QtScript
were first announced.

As people provided specific examples of common features that would be
broken, the deprecation was delayed by 6 months (maybe 12, I cannot really
remember and time flies).

We are now at the second deprecation announcement, and this time it seems
it's for real. Most features people requested were added to
QJSEngine/QWebEngine (not necessarily with an easy or optimal migration
path).

-- 
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec \
23, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Luigi Toscano <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:luigi.toscano@tiscali.it" \
target="_blank">luigi.toscano@tiscali.it</a>&gt;</span> wrote:</div><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div>  </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""> <br>
</span>Shouldn&#39;t it be the other way around? Workable solution first and drop the \
old<br> one later?<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That&#39;s exactly what people said when plans \
to drop QtWebKit and QtScript were first announced.  </div><div><br></div><div>As \
people provided specific examples of common features that would be broken, the \
deprecation was delayed by 6 months (maybe 12, I cannot really remember and time \
flies).</div><div><br></div><div>We are now at the second deprecation announcement, \
and this time it seems it&#39;s for real. Most features people requested were added \
to QJSEngine/QWebEngine (not necessarily with an easy or optimal migration \
path).</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Pau Garcia i \
Quiles<br><a href="http://www.elpauer.org" \
target="_blank">http://www.elpauer.org</a><br>(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days \
to answer)</div> </div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic