[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Changes to our Git infrastructure
From: Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date: 2015-01-05 21:58:43
Message-ID: alpine.LNX.2.00.1501052251350.4754 () calcifer ! valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Thomas Lübking wrote:
>
> I don't think this is a problem w/ RB.
> When RRs get on k-c-d, many devs who can provide an abstract review are
> addressed. They can take /this/ load from the actual maintainer/main
> developer.
For me, personally, RB's mails are even worse. They are unreadable in
pine, which I am currently using while figuring out how to transfer my
mail reading to thunderbird. And I get way too many copies of one mail,
too.
(Same problem with this thread, or rather mailing list. Why the heck do I
need to get two copies of every reply to a mail of mine... One is
_enough_. And yes, I know about the whole reply-to-mangling-is-dangerous
lunacy.)
> I don't think this is a problem w/ RB.
> When RRs get on k-c-d, many devs who can provide an abstract review are
> addressed. They can take /this/ load from the actual maintainer/main
> developer.
Reviewboard isn't limited to kde-core-devel. And it doesn't answer my main
complaint: reviewboard, by its design, is made to whine about whitespace,
extra white at the end of lines and other one-line complaints. It gives
the reviewer a happy feeling of a job well-done, and the submitter a cold
shower. It's the kind of interaction RB encourages. And no, I don't
currently know of a better tool, but that doesn't mean the problems aren't
there.
Boud
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic