[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Changes to our Git infrastructure
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2015-01-05 21:26:24
Message-ID: alpine.LNX.2.00.1501052222250.4754 () calcifer ! valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


Well, _obviously_ reviewboard supports raising issues and adding comments 
, but neither facilitates actual conversation, i.e. discussion on what's 
up with a particular patch at a deeper level.

In short, what I meant is that as a tool to dicuss code changes, 
Reviewboard is a poor thing. It facilitates nit-picking, which is 
off-putting and useless, but at least gives the reviewer the feeling he's 
done his job, while it fails at making it easy to discuss the why, 
wherefore and how of a particular change.

On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Albert Astals Cid wrote:

> El Dilluns, 5 de gener de 2015, a les 18:40:54, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure:
>> I do agree, btw, with Ian, that the current reviewboard workflow is badly
>> broken and can be very discouraging. It doesn't support conversation
>
> What do you mean it doesn't support conversation?
>
> Cheers,
>  Albert
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]