[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure
From:       Sebastian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FCgler?= <sebas () kde ! org>
Date:       2014-12-23 13:41:26
Message-ID: 1601345.DvdFnyL9Or () miro
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday, December 19, 2014 23:26:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dijous, 18 de desembre de 2014, a les 14:52:12, Sebastian Kügler va 
> > On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 08:47:09 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> > > I understood that to be the case -- I'm really meaning for a general,
> > > KDE-wide solution.
> > >
> > > Personally I don't have an issue with volunteers taking care of
> > > non-official systems if it helps their productivity. If Gerrit wasn't
> > > where KDE as a whole went, and you wanted to put the effort in to keep
> > > Gerrit working for you and integrated with the rest of the KDE systems,
> > > more power to you.
> > >
> > > The issue I see (which doesn't necessarily reflect my personal views) is
> > > that KDE projects have been required to use KDE infrastructure. I forget
> > > where that's written/required, but I do know that that it exists. The
> > > purpose of this was to avoid fragmentation or making it difficult to
> > > find the full breadth of KDE projects, or requiring KDE developers to
> > > sign up for multiple e.g. bugtracking systems just to comment on another
> > > KDE project.
> >
> > I think you're referring to manifesto.kde.org. There's nothing in there
> > about Reviewboard, or a requirement that project have to use
> > infrastructure
> > hosted at kde.org, so I don't see that as a blocker.
> 
> I don't agree with that you said, manifesto says
> 
> "Online services associated with the project are either hosted on KDE 
> infrastructure or have an action plan that ensures continuity which is 
> approved by the KDE system administration team"

I stand corrected.
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]