[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Using Gerrit for code review in KDE
From:       Marco Martin <notmart () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-09-12 20:52:40
Message-ID: CAD6_Bos_RaggqgCMhxmqwSHFF4W1eV0mfOeqAgTn+PvmWYbpPQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Jan Kundr=C3=A1t <jkt@flaska.net> wrote:
>
> If you would like all plasma to go, just give me a list of repos and I
can make it happen.

No, definitely not yet

>
> In my opinion, the purpose of this test is not to verify that Gerrit
works or that the ACLs are set up properly -- both were done already.

As part of the experiment i would also like to try to have stricter acls
for +2 and submit, like starting from mantainers then slowly adding people
(that's also how i understood it would have worked during the bof)

--
Marco Martin

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Jan Kundrát &lt;<a \
href="mailto:jkt@flaska.net">jkt@flaska.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt;<br>&gt; If you \
would like all plasma to go, just give me a list of repos and I can make it \
happen.<br><br>No, definitely not yet<br><br>&gt;<br>&gt; In my opinion, the purpose \
of this test is not to verify that Gerrit works or that the ACLs are set up properly \
-- both were done already.<br><br>As part of the experiment i would also like to try \
to have stricter acls for +2 and submit, like starting from mantainers then slowly \
adding people (that&#39;s also how i understood it would have worked during the \
bof)<br><br>--<br>Marco Martin 



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]