[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KDM + ConsoleKit + Logind
From: Lukáš Tinkl <ltinkl () redhat ! com>
Date: 2014-02-17 12:55:07
Message-ID: 530206AB.2040700 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
> Ahoys
>
> I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
> system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
> question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build
> without CK support. In short:
>
> If the rest of the system uses Logind, should KDM be built without CK support?
>
> Would building without CK support reduce user functionality, and if so
> aren't we then essentially requiring distributions that use KDM to
> continue using CK until Plasma Next comes along? (we are not
> communicating this very if this is the case).
>
> TIA
>
> HS
>
Hi,
I'm not entirely sure about kdm but for the rest of the code in
kde-workspace (kworkspace, powerdevil et co.), login1 support is fairly
complete and preferred over CK.
(cc'ng Martin who works on login managers)
--
Lukáš Tinkl <ltinkl@redhat.com>
Software Engineer - KDE desktop team, Brno
KDE developer <lukas@kde.org>
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic