[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC
From:       Shantanu Tushar Jha <shantanu () kde ! org>
Date:       2014-01-10 6:49:04
Message-ID: CABQ4Km-qQhvM6+j_+XGgCCHvm_=YKme63A7=nrJ6iNKBnwteFA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Àlex Fiestas <afiestas@kde.org> wrote:

> On Thursday 09 January 2014 21:52:52 Christoph Feck wrote:
> > But if the above scenario does not work, we should probably not
> > introduce Baloo for KDE SC 4.x.
>
> I have to disagree here.
>
> We can't keep playing this conservative when we have things that are in the
> Nepomuk situation. If it is the most hated piece of software we have is
> not by
> chance.
>

s/is the/was the. Nepomuk is very usable since few releases now, at least I
am going to cry (as a user) if you're gonna break my alt+f2 search.


> If the breakage is minimal (which I know it is, but I will let vHanda
> reply to
> that) I vote to replace it even if we make a bit worse the experience using
> some weird application that nobody has heard of.
>
> Ps: Some distros even disable Nepomuk by default... Really with this we are
> going to annoying almost nobody.
>

But not the distros which have the biggest userbase for KDE? (I'm thinking
Kubuntu, OpenSUSE, Fedora-KDE)

If we are *absolutely sure* we won't break stuff for the user, go ahead.
But, lets not do a KDE 4.0 again, with Desktop Search.


-- 
Shantanu Tushar    (UTC +0530)
http://www.shantanutushar.com

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 10, \
2014 at 3:56 AM, Àlex Fiestas <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:afiestas@kde.org" \
target="_blank">afiestas@kde.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br> <blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Thursday 09 January 2014 21:52:52 \
Christoph Feck wrote:<br> &gt; But if the above scenario does not work, we should \
probably not<br> &gt; introduce Baloo for KDE SC 4.x.<br>
<br>
</div>I have to disagree here.<br>
<br>
We can&#39;t keep playing this conservative when we have things that are in the<br>
Nepomuk situation. If it is the most hated piece of software we have is not by<br>
chance.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>s/is the/was the. Nepomuk is very usable \
since few releases now, at least I am going to cry (as a user) if you&#39;re gonna \
break my alt+f2 search.<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 \
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<br>
If the breakage is minimal (which I know it is, but I will let vHanda reply to<br>
that) I vote to replace it even if we make a bit worse the experience using<br>
some weird application that nobody has heard of.<br>
<br>
Ps: Some distros even disable Nepomuk by default... Really with this we are<br>
going to annoying almost nobody.<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">But not the distros which have \
the biggest userbase for KDE? (I&#39;m thinking Kubuntu, OpenSUSE, \
Fedora-KDE)<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"> If \
we are *absolutely sure* we won&#39;t break stuff for the user, go ahead. But, lets \
not do a KDE 4.0 again, with Desktop Search.<br clear="all"></div><div \
class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Shantanu Tushar    (UTC +0530)<br> <a \
href="http://www.shantanutushar.com" \
target="_blank">http://www.shantanutushar.com</a> </div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]