From kde-core-devel Mon Jan 06 08:33:38 2014 From: Martin Graesslin Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:33:38 +0000 To: kde-core-devel Subject: Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance Message-Id: <2560226.tmiFhWTZOc () martin-thinkpad> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=138899708108932 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1479892.b80Y9lnilo" --nextPart1479892.b80Y9lnilo Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Monday 06 January 2014 07:52:50 Kevin Ottens wrote: > The current list of modules is there: > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List > > As you can see there's quite some holes in the table, and quite a few > entries marked unmaintained. KDE Frameworks as a set of technologies will > only be taken seriously if we get something more complete there. I urge > everyone with an interest in KDE Frameworks to step up, look at that list > and volunteer to maintain a framework. If you volunteer, know that the > following will be expected from you: > 1) Complete in the table the information regarding your framework; > 2) Do an API review and modernization pass in your framework (possibly with > the help of others); > 3) Stick around for a long period to act as maintainer (see below for > details); > 4) The day you want to move away from your duties, do so responsibly, don't > just disappear, make sure you pass the torch to someone else (probably the > most important point in the list!). I have a question concerning the platforms: must a maintainer be able to support/maintain all platforms or can a maintainer say I only maintain the framework for platform foo? This is a very important point given that our community comes from a Linux background and testing patches on other platforms requires to buy software and/or new hardware. To make a very practical example: so far maintainership of KWindowSystem was in the KWin team, but obviously we can only maintain the X11 part of it. To go with that: can a framework be team maintained? E.g. could I write down "KWin team" or just write down "KWin maintainer" to bind the maintainership to KWin as it used to be? Cheers Martin --nextPart1479892.b80Y9lnilo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlLKamoACgkQqVXwidMiVrr1pwCghRN359SbeyDLE5Rbj5oCwmnr RCcAnAr9Chho6SfHECYODrUV0UZ8UZD/ =IaHE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1479892.b80Y9lnilo--