From kde-core-devel  Mon Nov 25 23:24:56 2013
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Thomas_L=FCbking?= <thomas.luebking () gmail ! com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:24:56 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KMountPoint::probablySlow and cifs mount points
Message-Id: <744e1891-a1dd-432e-bed6-641b271e6000 () gmail ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=138542156412337

On Montag, 25. November 2013 23:31:59 CEST, Alexander Neundorf wrote:=0A=
=0A> hmm, doesn't have to be really complicated, just a little bit more=
 =0A> sophisticated than it is now, e.g. like the following, which is =0A=
> not too hard =0A> to do:=0A> probablySlow =3D (NFS || CIFS) && (host =
is not in my own subnet || NIC is =0A> wireless)=0A=0A- wired NIC conne=
cted to WLAN router/repeater=0A- wired 10Mbps NIC=0A- remote system on =
WLAN=0A- remote system reads from USBv1.1 or CDROM=0A- traffic shaping=0A=
- SMB/CIFS is slow even on fast connections (see the bug Albert linked)=
=0A=0AOTOH, NFS to another subnet (the next in-house router, GBit) can =
be pretty fast.=0AFor servers, read & write can largely differ and what=
not.=0A=0AWhat one actually can have is "isNotSlow()", ie. is a local t=
empfs or HDD/SSD=0A=0ACheers,=0AThomas