[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle
From:       Àlex Fiestas <afiestas () kde ! org>
Date:       2013-07-09 13:41:58
Message-ID: 1887192.zuCrm7puN7 () monsterbad
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:07:33 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2013-07-09, Vishesh Handa <me@vhanda.in> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Harald Sitter <sitter@kde.org> wrote:
> >> there would not be any problem. But reality diverges :(
> > 
> > I'm all for fixing this in at least KDE SC. That way if/when we have
> > shorter releases you can have some kind of guarantee that you will not
> > encounter strange behaviours like the one you described.
> 
> try get okular source code (Or another app that has been around since
> forever)
> 
> then install midnight commander (mc) and set the right pane to
> quickview.
> 
> Now you can see in the right  pane all the various licensing headers
> while you in the left pane scrolls tthur the files.
> 
> Try also libkdcraw. or kdepim.
> 
> But all this is mostly old code. Looking at something new like
> nepomuk-core or okteta, the licensing is quite clear and conformant to
> be automatically figured out.
> 
> /Sune

If we keep copyright holders and licence, we can change the structure of the 
header, no?

If so, we could start reformatting them bit a bit, just like we do with 
kdelibs coding style.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]