[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Review Request: Fix for CTRL+Tab not switcing tabs in Konqueror when the active tab is a Dolphin
From:       "Frank Reininghaus" <frank78ac () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2012-09-26 11:13:31
Message-ID: 20120926111331.21788.59369 () vidsolbach ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

> On Sept. 25, 2012, 9:03 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
> > Thanks for analysing this issue and for the patch!
> > 
> > We should of course let those events propagate. However, I'm a bit confused. The \
> > docs of QObject::eventFilter() don't mention anything about setting the \
> > 'accepted' state of the event. If I understand it correctly, the event is \
> > filtered (i.e., not handled further) only if eventFilter() returns true. 
> > Even if your patch fixes the issue, I'm therefore wondering if it just hides the \
> > real bug. 
> > I think that what is actually supposed to happen is that DolphinView does not \
> > filter the event and that the KItemListView does not handle the event either, \
> > such that the unhandled event is passed through to the parent widgets until it \
> > ends up in the KonqCombo, such that KonqMainWindow::eventFilter() gets it, right? \
> > If that is true, I think the real bug might be that some class pretends to handle \
> > the event, such that its parents don't see it, although it does nothing with the \
> > event. 
> > I had a quick look at the code and found that KItemListView::event() accepts the \
> > event and returns true if m_controller->processEvent() returns true, but does not \
> > ignore() the event if that is not the case. I haven't tested it yet, but maybe \
> > that is the real problem?
> 
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Accepting the event means that it's not further propagated (to the parenting \
> widget) returning "true" in the event filter means to "eat" the event, ie. prevent \
> regular handling in following eventfilters or even the widget event handling \
> itself. 
> The patch will ensure that the (input, i assume) event goes up to the parent widget \
> and is handled there if nothing else accepts it. If you returned true, no further \
> processing would happen at all (ie. even DolphinView::event() would process it) 
> You should btw. ensure that the parenting QScrollArea accepts it, or oxygen will \
> get bugs because selecting items in dolphin will start to move the window ;-) 
> Disclaimer: i've not even seen the bug, just generally commented on question and \
> the one-liner diff 
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> PS: the actually more correct fix was to align to the Qt::WA_NoMousePropagation \
> attribute and set it accordingly (allowing the usercode to manage the behavior this \
> way)

Thanks Thomas for your message.

> Accepting the event means that it's not further propagated (to the parenting \
> widget) returning "true" in the event filter means to "eat" the event, ie. prevent \
> regular handling in following eventfilters or even the widget event handling \
> itself.

Yes, that's just what I thought.

> The patch will ensure that the (input, i assume) event goes up to the parent widget \
> and is handled there if nothing else accepts it.

Yes, but what I meant is that the patch ensures that by "ignore()'ing" the event in \
the wrong place. AFAIU, the eventFilter() should not mess around with the 'accepted' \
state of the event at all. I think the actual problem is that some event() method \
does not handle the event, but forgets to ignore() it.

> You should btw. ensure that the parenting QScrollArea accepts it, or oxygen will \
> get bugs because selecting items in dolphin will start to move the window ;-)

Hm, but then I don't see how the key press should actually reach one of the parents \
inside Konqueror, but maybe I've misunderstood how Konqueror's Control+Tab feature \
actually works. Maybe I have to debug the path that the event takes step by step when \
I find some time.


- Frank


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106569/#review19423
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 25, 2012, 3:38 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106569/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 25, 2012, 3:38 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Dolphin and KDE Base Apps.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch fixes a bug where pressing CTRL+Tab does not switch tabs when active tab \
> in Konqueror is a Dolphin's filemanagement part. It happens because DolphinView \
> installs an event filter and does not call event->ignore() or \
> event->setAccepted(false) to allow those events to be propagated up the event \
> chain. 
> 
> This addresses bug 302329.
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302329
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
> dolphin/src/views/dolphinview.cpp 0584972 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106569/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dawit Alemayehu
> 
> 


[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<html>
 <body>
  <div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
   <table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="8" style="border: 1px #c9c399 \
solid;">  <tr>
     <td>
      This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
      <a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106569/">http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106569/</a>
  </td>
    </tr>
   </table>
   <br />





<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: \
10px;">  <p style="margin-top: 0;">On September 25th, 2012, 9:03 p.m., <b>Frank \
Reininghaus</b> wrote:</p>  <blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px \
solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">  <pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: \
-moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: \
break-word;">Thanks for analysing this issue and for the patch!

We should of course let those events propagate. However, I&#39;m a bit confused. The \
docs of QObject::eventFilter() don&#39;t mention anything about setting the \
&#39;accepted&#39; state of the event. If I understand it correctly, the event is \
filtered (i.e., not handled further) only if eventFilter() returns true.

Even if your patch fixes the issue, I&#39;m therefore wondering if it just hides the \
real bug.

I think that what is actually supposed to happen is that DolphinView does not filter \
the event and that the KItemListView does not handle the event either, such that the \
unhandled event is passed through to the parent widgets until it ends up in the \
KonqCombo, such that KonqMainWindow::eventFilter() gets it, right? If that is true, I \
think the real bug might be that some class pretends to handle the event, such that \
its parents don&#39;t see it, although it does nothing with the event.

I had a quick look at the code and found that KItemListView::event() accepts the \
event and returns true if m_controller-&gt;processEvent() returns true, but does not \
ignore() the event if that is not the case. I haven&#39;t tested it yet, but maybe \
that is the real problem?</pre>  </blockquote>




 <p>On September 25th, 2012, 9:13 p.m., <b>Thomas Lübking</b> wrote:</p>
 <blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: \
10px;">  <pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: \
-pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Accepting the event \
means that it&#39;s not further propagated (to the parenting widget) returning \
&quot;true&quot; in the event filter means to &quot;eat&quot; the event, ie. prevent \
regular handling in following eventfilters or even the widget event handling itself.

The patch will ensure that the (input, i assume) event goes up to the parent widget \
and is handled there if nothing else accepts it. If you returned true, no further \
processing would happen at all (ie. even DolphinView::event() would process it)

You should btw. ensure that the parenting QScrollArea accepts it, or oxygen will get \
bugs because selecting items in dolphin will start to move the window ;-)

Disclaimer: i&#39;ve not even seen the bug, just generally commented on question and \
the one-liner diff</pre>  </blockquote>





 <p>On September 25th, 2012, 9:15 p.m., <b>Thomas Lübking</b> wrote:</p>
 <blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: \
10px;">  <pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: \
-pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">PS: the actually more \
correct fix was to align to the Qt::WA_NoMousePropagation attribute and set it \
accordingly (allowing the usercode to manage the behavior this way)</pre>  \
</blockquote>








</blockquote>

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: \
-pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Thanks Thomas for your \
message.

&gt; Accepting the event means that it&#39;s not further propagated (to the parenting \
widget) &gt; returning &quot;true&quot; in the event filter means to &quot;eat&quot; \
the event, ie. prevent regular handling in following eventfilters or even the widget \
event handling itself.

Yes, that&#39;s just what I thought.

&gt; The patch will ensure that the (input, i assume) event goes up to the parent \
widget and is handled there if nothing else accepts it.

Yes, but what I meant is that the patch ensures that by &quot;ignore()&#39;ing&quot; \
the event in the wrong place. AFAIU, the eventFilter() should not mess around with \
the &#39;accepted&#39; state of the event at all. I think the actual problem is that \
some event() method does not handle the event, but forgets to ignore() it.

&gt; You should btw. ensure that the parenting QScrollArea accepts it, or oxygen will \
get bugs because selecting items in dolphin will start to move the window ;-)

Hm, but then I don&#39;t see how the key press should actually reach one of the \
parents inside Konqueror, but maybe I&#39;ve misunderstood how Konqueror&#39;s \
Control+Tab feature actually works. Maybe I have to debug the path that the event \
takes step by step when I find some time.</pre> <br />








<p>- Frank</p>


<br />
<p>On September 25th, 2012, 3:38 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote:</p>






<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" \
style="background-image: \
url('http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/rb/images/review_request_box_top_bg.png'); \
background-position: left top; background-repeat: repeat-x; border: 1px black \
solid;">  <tr>
  <td>

<div>Review request for Dolphin and KDE Base Apps.</div>
<div>By Dawit Alemayehu.</div>


<p style="color: grey;"><i>Updated Sept. 25, 2012, 3:38 p.m.</i></p>






<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
 <table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" \
style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">  <tr>
  <td>
   <pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: \
-moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: \
break-word;">This patch fixes a bug where pressing CTRL+Tab does not switch tabs when \
active tab in Konqueror is a Dolphin&#39;s filemanagement part. It happens because \
DolphinView installs an event filter and does not call event-&gt;ignore() or \
event-&gt;setAccepted(false) to allow those events to be propagated up the event \
chain.</pre>  </td>
 </tr>
</table>




<div style="margin-top: 1.5em;">
 <b style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Bugs: </b>


 <a href="http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302329">302329</a>


</div>


<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> </h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">

 <li>dolphin/src/views/dolphinview.cpp <span style="color: \
grey">(0584972)</span></li>

</ul>

<p><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106569/diff/" style="margin-left: \
3em;">View Diff</a></p>




  </td>
 </tr>
</table>








  </div>
 </body>
</html>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic