--bcaec54a32529cfa2204c96e16ad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> wrote:

> El Dimarts, 11 de setembre de 2012, a les 09:51:22, Dawit A va escriure:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org>
> wrote:
> > > It seems that the
> > >
> > > set(KDE_MIN_VERSION "4.7.97")
> >
> > Was that done intentionally or was it forgotten to be updated for the KDE
> > 4.9 release ? If the former, then have we now started guaranteeing
> forward
> > compatibility too ?
>
> It was done on purpose. Why require newer kdelibs when you don't need them.
>

Because you really don't know that you need them until you actually do ?
Like I said bug fixes and regressions sometimes require changes in kdelibs.
If we purposefully shackle ourselves to forward compatibility then such
bugs and regressions, no matter how bad, cannot be fixed until the next
major release. If that is acceptable for the sake of being forward
compatible, then that is fine. However, I really do not see the point of
it. Why would anyone want to use new version of applications with the older
version of the required libraries ?

--bcaec54a32529cfa2204c96e16ad
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Albert=
 Astals Cid <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:aacid@kde.org" target=
=3D"_blank">aacid@kde.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gma=
il_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-lef=
t:1ex">

El Dimarts, 11 de setembre de 2012, a les 09:51:22, Dawit A va escriure:<br=
>
<div class=3D"im">&gt; On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Albert Astals Cid &=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:aacid@kde.org">aacid@kde.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; It seems that the<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; set(KDE_MIN_VERSION &quot;4.7.97&quot;)<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Was that done intentionally or was it forgotten to be updated for the =
KDE<br>
&gt; 4.9 release ? If the former, then have we now started guaranteeing for=
ward<br>
&gt; compatibility too ?<br>
<br>
</div>It was done on purpose. Why require newer kdelibs when you don&#39;t =
need them.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Because you really don&#39;t=
 know that you need them until you actually do ? Like I said bug fixes and =
regressions sometimes require changes in kdelibs. If we purposefully shackl=
e ourselves to forward compatibility then such bugs and regressions, no mat=
ter how bad, cannot be fixed until the next major release. If that is accep=
table for the sake of being forward compatible, then that is fine. However,=
 I really do not see the point of it. Why would anyone want to use new vers=
ion of applications with the older version of the required libraries ?</div=
>

</div><br>

--bcaec54a32529cfa2204c96e16ad--