From kde-core-devel  Thu Aug 23 06:01:53 2012
From: Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4=DFlin?= <mgraesslin () kde ! org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:01:53 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Merging LightDM into KDE Workspaces (forwarded from plasma-devel)
Message-Id: <2842082.IEJcIfQE1s () martin-desktop>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=134570174918942
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2005715.ShpYtz6HIK"


--nextPart2005715.ShpYtz6HIK
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Wednesday 22 August 2012 20:44:00 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> From my personal view and as a packager, I would say "we only need *one*
> display manager in the workspace". So, if lightdm comes, then KDM must
> go in my opinion.
No, LightDM-KDE and KDM solve different problems. KDM is a full-blown display 
manager while LightDM-KDE is just the greeter for LightDM - a display manager 
not part of the KDE Plasma Workspaces.

These two projects serve different needs and are not competitive (even if they 
were I want to point out that we also ship two file managers). At the moment 
including LightDM-KDE just means that we make it an alternative distributions 
can use.

We btw already discussed that on the plasma mailinglist and so far all agreed 
that it does not have to replace KDM and that those two can be shipped 
alongside.

Cheers
Martin
--nextPart2005715.ShpYtz6HIK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlA1x1IACgkQqVXwidMiVrr8iQCgkxGCxCSoH0pUx3xovP9h4sDB
814AoI8GR3iO/BPlTP/If36aUBmQSTwk
=Dw2+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2005715.ShpYtz6HIK--