On 06/13/2012 10:58 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dimecres, 13 de juny de 2012, a les 17:43:10, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Trüg<sebastian@trueg.de>  wrote:
>>> I am totally lost. What is the problem with that commit?
>>
>> AFAIK, the problem is that changes were made in both Soprano and KDElibs
>> for 4.9, but for 4.8.4, they are using this "changed" kdelibs with the old
>> soprano.
>
> Why did this happen? kdelibs is frozen so there should not be a commit that
> needs to be only in kdelibs 4.9 and not in kdelibs 4.8.4

Simple: it is a bugfix. But apparently that fix reveals another bug 
which I only fixed in Soprano 2.8.

> Cheers,
>    Albert
>
>>
>>> On 06/12/2012 07:40 PM, José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
>>>>   Therefore, I tend to think the kdelibs commit mentioned in that bug
>>>>
>>>>> report
>>>>> (**3d66d429cb48781881af3e735f2a80**af2114ab25) shouldn't have been done
>>>>> for
>>>>> 4.8.4. A confirmation from a Nepomuk developer would be highly
>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Just in case it isn't obvious enough, actually I meant this one shouldn't
>>>> have
>>>> been done for 4.8.4:
>>>> http://quickgit.kde.org/index.**php?p=kdelibs.git&a=commit&h=**
>>>> a43824a200ed76cef48a90bd3aee85**47698b7c91<http://quickgit.kde.org/index.
>>>> php?p=kdelibs.git&a=commit&h=a43824a200ed76cef48a90bd3aee8547698b7c91>
>>>> which is the kdelibs one. I just pasted the wrong hash.
>