El Dimecres, 13 de juny de 2012, a les 17:43:10, Vishesh Handa va escri=
ure:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Tr=FCg <sebastian@trueg.de=
> wrote:
> > I am totally lost. What is the problem with that commit?
>=20
> AFAIK, the problem is that changes were made in both Soprano and KDEl=
ibs
> for 4.9, but for 4.8.4, they are using this "changed" kdelibs with th=
e old
> soprano.

Why did this happen? kdelibs is frozen so there should not be a commit =
that=20
needs to be only in kdelibs 4.9 and not in kdelibs 4.8.4

Cheers,
  Albert

>=20
> > On 06/12/2012 07:40 PM, Jos=E9 Manuel Santamar=EDa Lema wrote:
> >>  Therefore, I tend to think the kdelibs commit mentioned in that b=
ug
> >> =20
> >>> report
> >>> (**3d66d429cb48781881af3e735f2a80**af2114ab25) shouldn't have bee=
n done
> >>> for
> >>> 4.8.4. A confirmation from a Nepomuk developer would be highly
> >>> appreciated.
> >>=20
> >> Just in case it isn't obvious enough, actually I meant this one sh=
ouldn't
> >> have
> >> been done for 4.8.4:
> >> http://quickgit.kde.org/index.**php?p=3Dkdelibs.git&a=3Dcommit&h=3D=
**
> >> a43824a200ed76cef48a90bd3aee85**47698b7c91<http://quickgit.kde.org=
/index.
> >> php?p=3Dkdelibs.git&a=3Dcommit&h=3Da43824a200ed76cef48a90bd3aee854=
7698b7c91>
> >> which is the kdelibs one. I just pasted the wrong hash.