Hi,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Sune Vuorela <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:nospam@vuorela.dk" target="_blank">nospam@vuorela.dk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 2012-06-12, Sebastian Trüg &lt;<a href="mailto:trueg@kde.org">trueg@kde.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; I do not have much time. But the real problem is that I am not sure<br>
&gt; where to look. It has to do with my own implementation of unix socket<br>
&gt; communication. Someone with experience in that area might want to review<br>
&gt; the *Socket* classes in soprano/client...<br>
<br>
</div>This might be a stupid question, but isn&#39;t soprano 2.6 using<br>
QLocalSocket ?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>On non-*nix systems thats true and also some other parts if I understood the commit message correctly. No idea though why he had to re-invent his own Socket class for local unix sockets, the commit just vaguely mentions threads or so.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Andreas</div><div><br></div><div>PS: Personally I think kdelibs dependency on a newer soprano shouldn&#39;t have happened at all - in particular not one that hasn&#39;t even seen a release yet or can be considered stable.</div>
</div>