--nextPart1573312.al5kdYPruH
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

On Wednesday 30 May 2012 17:47:31 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:56:00 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> > On Monday 28 of May 2012 20:34:51 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > > libgapi seems ok to me.
> >=20
> > I'm sorry, but unless there's an objective objection, I'll rename t=
he
> > library and everything inside to LibKGAPI.
>=20
> What about LibQGAPI ?
>=20
> There is a trend of making libraries called "tier1" which only depend=
 on Qt.

Note however that we use the "K" naming in those though. It's a vendor =
thing,=20
the Qt (for libs) and Q (for libs and classes) namespaces are for the Q=
t=20
project itself. The KDE community uses the K namespace in most cases.

So for something produced and hosted by the KDE community I think libkg=
api is=20
a more proper name than libqgapi.

Regards.
--=20
K=E9vin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

--nextPart1573312.al5kdYPruH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk/GRpMACgkQB0u7y43syeKG1QCePY2Mb6AoOCzfl8Op0GfX6yD8
lb8AoJ+PPjyUrPyGGUd0vf1EcRHS0EOa
=zgzF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1573312.al5kdYPruH--