On Sunday 04 December 2011 10.02.20 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> i know its relatively late to bring this up, but better before a first
> initial  release to do so: is there any chance that these libraries could
> get more descriptive names?
> 
> there is already a "libmm" which is actually a shared memory helper,
> unrelated  to libmm-qt (though the name suggests otherwise). "mm" and "nm"
> really don't say much about what these libraries do. the names are
> ambiguous and stand a high chance of collision with other libraries.

+1

-- 
Thomas Zander