[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Frameworks mailing list
From:       Steven Sroka <sroka.steven () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-11-17 21:21:55
Message-ID: CAKn2qcX1z6WKEVrUazNyNpHFxxWYaVKqC7wgk+vwHgJvf6HYaw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

>2011/11/17 Andras Mantia <amantia@kde.org>:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:17:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> > i was not sure i agreed with that approach, but i have to say that
>> > the last few threads on this topic on k-c-d have supported their
>> > point :(
>> I would draw exactly the opposite conclusion.
>>
>> If the signal to noise ratio here is considered too low, then having
>> the KF5 discussions here
>> * would have increased the signal, and thereby increased the SNR
>> * IMO would also have decreased the feeled need for the lengthy
>> discussions taking place now, since people would feel better
>> informed, which would decrease the noise, thereby increasing the SNR
>>
>> Seriously, IMO it's a "bug" if the core KDE developers don't use
>> kde-core- devel for communication.
>
> =A0Exactly. Frameworks is the *core* of KDE. What is kde-core-devel then?
>
>> P.S. from my POV, I'm not sure using kde-core-devel for the
>> reviewboard mails is really necessary
>
> This is questionable, as those mails are about kdelibs patches, no?
> Think about those as what they are: contributions to kdelibs that need a
> discussion. Like in the old days, when you'd post a patch to a mailing
> list.

True, but then shouldnn't those interested in reviewboard patches go
read what's on the reviewboard?

>
> Andras
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]