From kde-core-devel  Tue Oct 11 19:42:10 2011
From: Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:42:10 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Security Audit Request for Screenlocker Branch
Message-Id: <201110112142.17181 () thufir ! ingo-kloecker ! de>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=131836216720368
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart1444944.oyFkbsxQJx"

--nextPart1444944.oyFkbsxQJx
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Thomas L=FCbking wrote:
> Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
>=20
> schrieb Torgny Nyblom <nyblom@kde.org>:
> > Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
> > password unlock? If so why is that not a vaild usecase? It's what I
> > use at home all the time.
>=20
> "Why that?"
>=20
> xdpms saves you power (and screen, if that would be any necessary)
> and neither the last generation of CRTs nor any consumer quality tft
> "burns in"

Until recently I used to believe this. Unfortunately, it's not true. At=20
work we have several (well, at least two) TFTs which have the line edit=20
of the login screen burned in. It's clearly visible before a dark gray=20
mono-colored background.


Regards,
Ingo

--nextPart1444944.oyFkbsxQJx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk6UnBkACgkQGnR+RTDgudg/fQCfW7aPsFzvEjg4CkRHpDn0EXA+
kZcAni/5Q+YC0WWQBLw5mHqNSMDI8/Mo
=mqAu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1444944.oyFkbsxQJx--