From kde-core-devel  Tue Oct 11 13:55:15 2011
From: Thomas =?UTF-8?B?TMO8Ymtpbmc=?= <thomas.luebking () gmail ! com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:55:15 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Security Audit Request for Screenlocker Branch
Message-Id: <20111011155515.2769db16 () gmail ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=131834134523141

Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom <nyblom@kde.org>:

> Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
> password unlock? If so why is that not a vaild usecase? It's what I
> use at home all the time.
"Why that?"

xdpms saves you power (and screen, if that would be any necessary) and
neither the last generation of CRTs nor any consumer quality tft "burns
in" - the only trouble makers would be plasma (sic! ;-) TVs which still
suck so much power that you should really turn them off while they're
not in use.

Locking the screen is a valid requirement, but just rendering some
fancy stuff (while you're not there anyway) is pointless energy (what
today often means "battery") wasting.

So you want to do that again why?

Cheers,
Thomas